Ceramic types refer to the most basic classification group defined for a particular ceramic item.
Ceramic typology limitations.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of ceramic.
In archaeology a typology is the result of the classification of things according to their physical characteristics.
The products of the classification i e.
Issues and limitations in ceramic typology.
Extremely high melting point.
Low coefficient of friction.
Ceramic typology for cultures that produced pottery archaeologists invariably spend a great deal of time defining ceramic types each type is a series of attributes which distinguishes one group of pottery whether whole vessels or potsherds from all other groups of pottery such that each type was produced in a single time and place.
However when compared with the significant growth of related methodology in the last decades theoretical.
Non archaeologists should be aware of the limitations of ceramic typology.
Obsidian hydration is regularly used in mesoamerican sites such as copan.
Unesco eolss sample chapters archaeology vol.
I classification and typology william y.
Most archaeological typologies organize portable artifacts into types but typologies of larger structures including buildings field monuments fortifications or roads are equally possible.
Archaeologist haves long disagreed about the reality usefulness implementation of southwestern ceramic types.
Professional disagreement over specifics is common.
The obsidian hydration laboratory at the university of auckland new zealand describes the method in some detail.
Harder than conventional structure metals.
For cultures that produced pottery archaeologists invariably spend a great deal of time defining ceramic types each type is a series of attributes which distinguishes one group of pottery whether whole vessels or potsherds from all other groups of pottery such that each type was produced in a single time and place ideally the attributes used to identify types are ones.
All such typologies are abstractions and fail to describe all of the variability in an artistic tradition.
The subject of classification of ceramic types is not without controversy.
Hence a substantial methodological development has encouraged more standardized descriptive and grouping protocols based on mathematical and statistical parameters.
The morphological and typological study of pottery has traditionally been crucial for organizing excavation records.
Dating limitations are physical ones.
Ceramics placed into different wares assigned to specific traditions are than assigned to types based on surface including surface texture or painted styles indicative of pottery know to have been produced within particular geographic and during.
American antiquity 9 271 288 krieger an early exemplar of functional classification believed that artifacts should be classified in such a way as to.
The classes are also called types.
For example brew 1946 discussed in detail problems in using the kinds of conventions and strategies originally.
