Ceramic Vs Live Rock

2 it is used to cushion fragile rock materials during the tumbling process.

Ceramic vs live rock.

In its natural state it is very porous and will readily absorb liquids and staining agents. Yes i do agree that they do catch a lot of junk because stirring or moving them stir up a lot of green water. 3 it is used to improve the tumbling action in the tumbler barrel. The ceramic briquette was introduced to replace the lava rock as a cleaner more heat retentive alternative.

Denitrifying bacteria live deep inside rock ceramic and other porous materials where oxygen cannot reach them. 1 it delivers grit to hard to reach rock surfaces. Since the withdrawal of reef ceramics from the american aquarium market there has been a void of ceramic reef structures available to reef aquarists but these new pieces from cerameco are not only more interesting but. These bacteria eat nitrates and will only survive where there is no oxygen present.

Bio balls and ceramic rings vs live rock in the sump. Other manufacturers found that to get the same vaporizing flavors from the lava they. Unglazed materials are usually chosen over more durable options because of the. Ok everybody condemn bio balls and ceramic rings as detritus catchments tools and creating a nitrate factory.

Tumbling media has four functions. Ceramic briquettes vs lava rock. Some manufacturers moved from the lava grate system because the lava rock would crumble and leave a mess in the grill. In addition to launching their live rock replacement vida rock cerameco has also develoepd techniques for producing large handmade ceramic reefscapes and backgrounds.

You won t find this bacteria in plastic or foam filter media. This can be prevented to some extent by sealing the floor with a quality chemical ceramic tile sealer.